A joint committee set up to scrutinise the government's proposals said setting any "custody threshold" for getting idée cadeau noel homme the vote may look arbitrary but it believed that sentences of 12-months or less was the right level.
Sovereignty, conservative backbenchers, in particular, have urged Parliament to assert its sovereignty against what they say is the growing encroachment of the Court into what they argue are domestic matters.
'Rule of law the committee said voting was not an "absolute right" and that there is a "legitimate expectation those convicted of the most heinous crimes should, as part of their punishment, be stripped of the power embodied in the right to vote".However, it said there were no convincing penal arguments, in terms of deterrence or crime reduction, for withholding the vote.Ressources, service client, produits.It estimates about 7,000 prisoners in the UK would get the right to vote as a result and that this would have no bearing on the outcome of future elections.Image caption About 7,000 prisoners would get the vote immediately under the committee's recommendations.But it said those guilty of "heinous crimes" should be disenfranchised."Parliament will need to consider whether it is right to extend the franchise to those denied their liberty and the right to engage in society as a result of serving a custodial sentence he said."The decision about which offenders to enfranchise, particularly those on the cusp of a custodial or community sentence, should follow reflective judgement rather than an immediate splenetic response."."The government will consider the report carefully and will respond early next year, setting out how Parliament will be given its say.".Committee member Conservative MP Crispin Blunt said policy on the issue should not be driven "by an attitude of revenge and punishment" towards offenders but a "more constructive response of rehabilitation and restoration".It also recommends that prisoners serving longer sentences should be entitled to apply, up to six months before their scheduled release date, to vote in local, general and European elections.Last year, they published draft legislation setting out three options: maintaining the status quo, giving the vote to those serving custodial sentences of six months or less and enfranchising all prisoners sentenced to four years or less."This is an issue on which Parliament has expressed strong views a spokesman said.Prisoners serving jail terms of a year or less and those coming to the end of their sentences should be entitled to vote, a cross-party committee of MPs and peers has recommended.Ministers have suggested they will do the minimum required to comply with the ruling in order to fulfil the UK's obligations as a signatory to the European Convention of Human Rights."While I believe the Court overreached itself in imposing this judgement on this issue on the UK, the merits of the case were on its side he said.It also warned the UK would set a damaging precedent if it chose to ignore the rulings of the European Court - by potentially giving other countries the green light to flout the rule of law.Image caption The European Court of Human Rights has said the UK must reconsider its position.MPs voted to keep the blanket ban on prisoner voting - excluding those on remand - in 2011 in the face of the European Court of Human Rights' repeated calls for the UK to comply with its 2004 ruling.However, three members of the 12-strong Parliamentary Joint Committee on the Draft Voting Eligibility (Prisoners) Bill said retaining the current blanket ban should be considered as well as the 12-month threshold.
The government is considering its options after the European Court of Human Rights ruled the UK's current ban on prisoner voting is unlawful.
The committee said the vote should "not be removed without good reason".